Data was basically analysed playing with SPSS twenty five.0. Earliest descriptive analyses have been performed, together with Cronbach’s alphas and you may wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were utilized to assess connections between intercourse, ages, sexual orientation, having an intimate/sexual partner, SNS put, sexting normalisation and you may willingness to engage in sexting while the independent details, and also the five sexting habits since based parameters. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 is actually considered as a way of measuring impact size. All parameters had been entered towards model additionally. The analysis has also been stratified of the sex.
Prevalence of sexting behaviours
The most typical sexting habits are becoming (21.2%) and having through an intermediary (28.4%), with 3rd-group forwarding of sexual posts (9.3%) and, lastly, giving (8.1%). Descriptive statistics are provided for the Dining table 2.
Brand new regression models was indeed significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is .42 with the “sending” model, .29 towards the “receiving” model, .23 towards the “third-cluster forwarding” design, and you can .17 into the “acquiring thru a mediator” model (Desk step three:
On the “sending” design, willingness in order to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% trust period [CI]: 5.36-), which have an intimate/intimate companion (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), using Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), sexual positioning (OR: step one.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-step three.00) and you can age (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.step 14-step 1.63) have been rather linked to giving involvement. Regarding the “receiving” model, having an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step 3.27; 95% CI: 2.51-4.28), desire in order to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 2.01-3.89), using Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: 1.16-3.10), sex (OR: step one.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-2.41), using Snapchat (OR: step one.6step 1; 95% CI: step one.dos1-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-step 1.86) and you may age (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.step one2-1.41) was indeed notably about researching involvement.
Regarding “third-cluster forwarding” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: step 1.16-six.51), readiness so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.00; https://gorgeousbrides.net/novias-japonesas/ 95% CI: 1.48-dos.72), sex (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: step 1.32-dos.91), having an enchanting/intimate lover (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step 1.29-2.68), playing with Facebook (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step one.87) and you will age (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-1.66) had been notably associated with involvement inside third-cluster forwarding.
Regarding “receiving through a mediator” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.47-3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step 1.52-2.24), having a romantic/sexual mate (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: step 1.35-2.17), intercourse (OR: step 1.41; 95% CI: step 1.step 11-step 1.80) and you may decades (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-1.49) were rather connected with engagement into the receiving via a mediator.
Intercourse variations
Brand new regression patterns was indeed high. Nagelkerke’s R dos is .50 for females and you can .41 having men towards the “sending” model; .30 for females and you can .30 getting people to your “receiving” model; .18 for girls and you can .twenty four to have guys towards “third-people forwarding” model; and you can .14 for girls and you will .twenty two having men on the “searching via an intermediary” design (Dining table cuatro:
About “sending” model, for girls, willingness so you can sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have an intimate/sexual mate (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and you may many years (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.17-2.20) have been notably connected with sending involvement. To possess people, these were desire in order to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: 3.68-nine.94), having a romantic/intimate lover (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and using Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: step 1.32-cuatro.29).
Regarding “receiving” model, for females, willingness so you can sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), using Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), that have an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: step one.13-2.33) and ages (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: 1.17-1.72) was rather connected with researching engagement. To have boys, they were with an intimate/sexual spouse (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.58-3.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: step one.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-step one.86) and you will decades (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: step one.04-1.38).
Recent Comments